Home > Blog > Blog

MURS220T3G Equivalent, Alternative & Replacement Guide

2026/8/6 16:00:35

MURS220T3G Equivalent, Alternative & Replacement Guide | ICMASS

The MURS220T3G is ON Semi's 200V/2A ultrafast rectifier in SMB. It's active — you're not replacing an obsolete part. But you might want an alternative: smaller footprint (SMA), more current (3A), faster recovery, or second-source. Same function, different trade-off.

Here are the three best alternatives, compared head-to-head with the original — and when each makes sense.

MURS220T3G vs MURA220T3G vs MURS320T3G: Full Comparison

ParameterMURS220T3G (Original)MURA220T3GMURS320T3G
TypeUltrafast, SMBUltrafast, SMAUltrafast, SMC
Voltage (VRRM)200V200V200V
Current (IO)2A2A3A
VF @ Rated I0.95V @ 2A0.95V @ 2A0.95V @ 3A
trr35ns35ns75ns
RθJL13°C/W24°C/W<10°C/W
Package (mm)SMB 4.32×3.56SMA 4.57×2.92SMC 6.86×5.84
Best ForBalanced thermals & sizeSpace-constrained, <1.5AHigher current, best thermals

RθJL — lower is cooler

MURS320 (SMC)<10°C/W
MURS220 (SMB)13°C/W
MURA220 (SMA)24°C/W

When to Use MURA220T3G (SMA)

Same silicon: 200V/2A/35ns. But SMA gives RθJL=24°C/W — nearly double SMB's 13. Use when board space binds and load <1.5A. Below 1A open-air, the thermal penalty doesn't matter. But how? SMA and SMB footprints differ by ~0.64mm width. Check your layout.

When to Use MURS320T3G (SMC, 3A)

Step up to MURS320T3G: 3A, SMC, RθJL<10°C/W. But trr jumps 35→75ns. Below 100kHz at 2.5–3A, current headroom beats the speed penalty. Above 150kHz, recovery loss adds up. SMC body is ~7mm — check your board outline.

When NOT to Use Either — Go Schottky Instead

Rail under 48V? Skip ultrafast entirely. MBRS3100T3G (100V/3A Schottky) gives 0.79V VF and zero recovery — half the conduction loss, no switching loss. The catch: 5mA leakage at 125°C, 100V limit. If your design lives within those constraints, Schottky beats ultrafast on efficiency. But why? Physics, not opinion.

Pinout & Layout Notes

Footprint Comparison: SMA vs SMB vs SMC (Pin 1 = Cathode) SMA 4.57×2.92 SMB 4.32×3.56 MURS220 SMC 6.86×5.84 MURS220T3G Pinout & Polarity (SMB, Case 403A-03) CATHODE MURS220T3G Marking: U2D Pin 2 Anode Pin 1 Cathode J-bend leads • Cathode pad carries ~80% of heat • Expand cathode copper pour

trr — lower is faster switching

MURS220/MURA22035ns
MURS32075ns

All three: 2-pin, cathode-banded, J-bend SMD. Pin 1=Cathode, Pin 2=Anode. Cathode pad carries most heat — expand into copper pour. Layout fits SMC? Solder any of them onto SMC pads for free cooling. SMA on SMC pads looks odd but works fine electrically.

Other Alternatives Worth Knowing

  • ES2B-13-F (Diodes Inc.): 200V/2A, 20ns trr, 0.92V VF, SMA. Faster recovery than MURS220, but smaller SMA package means less thermal mass. Best for second-source where speed matters more than thermals.
  • VS-2EJH02-M3 (Vishay FRED Pt): 200V/2A, 25ns trr, 0.93V VF, SlimSMA. Performance upgrade path, but SlimSMA footprint is different — not a drop-in. Worth the layout change if you need 10ns faster recovery.
  • SURS8220T3G (ON Semi AEC-Q101): Same silicon and SMB package as MURS220T3G, with full automotive PPAP documentation. Use for production automotive programs where paperwork matters.
  • MBRS3100T3G (ON Semi Schottky): Different technology entirely. 100V/3A, 0.79V VF, zero trr. If your rail is under 48V, this is the efficiency upgrade path.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q1: Is MURA220T3G a direct drop-in replacement for MURS220T3G?

A: Electrically yes, mechanically no. Same silicon, same specs. But the SMA package is narrower (2.92mm vs SMB's 3.56mm). The pads don't align. You need a PCB change. If you're starting a new layout and want the smaller footprint, use MURA220T3G. If you're replacing on an existing SMB layout, stick with MURS220T3G or its AEC-Q SURS8220 variant.

Q2: Can I replace MURS220T3G with a Schottky?

A: Yes, if your rail is under ~65V. An MBRS3100T3G gives lower VF and zero recovery. But the 100V rating vs 200V means less headroom, and 5mA leakage at 125°C may cause thermal issues in reverse-biased configurations. For sub-48V forward-biased applications, the Schottky is an upgrade. Above 65V or in bridge rectifiers, keep the ultrafast.

Q3: What's the difference between MURS220T3 and MURS220T3G?

A: The "G" suffix = Pb-free, halogen-free, RoHS. MURS220T3 is obsolete (non-RoHS). MURS220T3G is the active replacement. Electrically identical. Always use the -G version for new designs.

Q4: Which alternative has the lowest thermal resistance?

A: MURS320T3G (SMC), with RθJL under 10°C/W. Nearly 25% better than MURS220's 13°C/W, and less than half of MURA220's 24°C/W. If your design runs hot, the bigger SMC package pays for itself in reliability. But it's 6.86mm long — check your board outline before committing.

Q5: Are there any through-hole equivalents?

A: MUR220 (DO-15/DO-201AD) is the through-hole version. Same 200V/2A/35ns ultrafast specs. Useful for prototyping, power supply repair, or designs where surface-mount isn't feasible. But if you're converting from through-hole to SMD, the MURS220T3G is the surface-mount equivalent. Same silicon, different package.

Related Products

Subscribe to IC-MAX!
Contact Name
*Email
Featured PartsMore
LNK304DN-TL
LNK304DN-TL Power Integrations
LNK304GN-TL
LNK304GN-TL Power Integrations
LNK304DG-TL
LNK304DG-TL Power Integrations
TNY277PN
TNY277PN Power Integrations
TNY276PN
TNY276PN Power Integrations
TNY278PN
TNY278PN Power Integrations
TNY278GN-TL
TNY278GN-TL Power Integrations
TNY280GN-TL
TNY280GN-TL Power Integrations
TOP266KG-TL
TOP266KG-TL Power Integrations
TOP258PN
TOP258PN Power Integrations
TOP253PN
TOP253PN Power Integrations
TOP253PNAU
TOP253PNAU Power Integrations
index: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
ICMASS.COM

HOME

ICMASS.COM

PRODUCT

ICMASS.COM

PHONE

ICMASS.COM

USER