The MURS220T3G is ON Semi's 200V/2A ultrafast rectifier in SMB. It's active — you're not replacing an obsolete part. But you might want an alternative: smaller footprint (SMA), more current (3A), faster recovery, or second-source. Same function, different trade-off.
Here are the three best alternatives, compared head-to-head with the original — and when each makes sense.
| Parameter | MURS220T3G (Original) | MURA220T3G | MURS320T3G |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Ultrafast, SMB | Ultrafast, SMA | Ultrafast, SMC |
| Voltage (VRRM) | 200V | 200V | 200V |
| Current (IO) | 2A | 2A | 3A |
| VF @ Rated I | 0.95V @ 2A | 0.95V @ 2A | 0.95V @ 3A |
| trr | 35ns | 35ns | 75ns |
| RθJL | 13°C/W | 24°C/W | <10°C/W |
| Package (mm) | SMB 4.32×3.56 | SMA 4.57×2.92 | SMC 6.86×5.84 |
| Best For | Balanced thermals & size | Space-constrained, <1.5A | Higher current, best thermals |
Same silicon: 200V/2A/35ns. But SMA gives RθJL=24°C/W — nearly double SMB's 13. Use when board space binds and load <1.5A. Below 1A open-air, the thermal penalty doesn't matter. But how? SMA and SMB footprints differ by ~0.64mm width. Check your layout.
Step up to MURS320T3G: 3A, SMC, RθJL<10°C/W. But trr jumps 35→75ns. Below 100kHz at 2.5–3A, current headroom beats the speed penalty. Above 150kHz, recovery loss adds up. SMC body is ~7mm — check your board outline.
Rail under 48V? Skip ultrafast entirely. MBRS3100T3G (100V/3A Schottky) gives 0.79V VF and zero recovery — half the conduction loss, no switching loss. The catch: 5mA leakage at 125°C, 100V limit. If your design lives within those constraints, Schottky beats ultrafast on efficiency. But why? Physics, not opinion.
All three: 2-pin, cathode-banded, J-bend SMD. Pin 1=Cathode, Pin 2=Anode. Cathode pad carries most heat — expand into copper pour. Layout fits SMC? Solder any of them onto SMC pads for free cooling. SMA on SMC pads looks odd but works fine electrically.
A: Electrically yes, mechanically no. Same silicon, same specs. But the SMA package is narrower (2.92mm vs SMB's 3.56mm). The pads don't align. You need a PCB change. If you're starting a new layout and want the smaller footprint, use MURA220T3G. If you're replacing on an existing SMB layout, stick with MURS220T3G or its AEC-Q SURS8220 variant.
A: Yes, if your rail is under ~65V. An MBRS3100T3G gives lower VF and zero recovery. But the 100V rating vs 200V means less headroom, and 5mA leakage at 125°C may cause thermal issues in reverse-biased configurations. For sub-48V forward-biased applications, the Schottky is an upgrade. Above 65V or in bridge rectifiers, keep the ultrafast.
A: The "G" suffix = Pb-free, halogen-free, RoHS. MURS220T3 is obsolete (non-RoHS). MURS220T3G is the active replacement. Electrically identical. Always use the -G version for new designs.
A: MURS320T3G (SMC), with RθJL under 10°C/W. Nearly 25% better than MURS220's 13°C/W, and less than half of MURA220's 24°C/W. If your design runs hot, the bigger SMC package pays for itself in reliability. But it's 6.86mm long — check your board outline before committing.
A: MUR220 (DO-15/DO-201AD) is the through-hole version. Same 200V/2A/35ns ultrafast specs. Useful for prototyping, power supply repair, or designs where surface-mount isn't feasible. But if you're converting from through-hole to SMD, the MURS220T3G is the surface-mount equivalent. Same silicon, different package.





