Both are Texas Instruments SWIFT family step-down converters. Same pinout, same package, same 5.5V–36V input range. The difference comes down to one thing: how much current do you need?
The beauty of the SWIFT family: you can start with a TPS5430 in your design, and if you realize you need more current later, swap to the TPS5450 without spinning the board. From what we see in customer designs, this flexibility is one of the main reasons engineers pick this family over newer parts.
| Parameter | TPS5430DDAR | TPS5450DDAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Output Current | 3A (4A peak) | 5A (6A peak) | TPS5450 |
| Input Voltage | 5.5V – 36V | 5.5V – 36V | Tie |
| Output Voltage | 1.22V – 31V | 1.22V – 31V | Tie |
| Switching Freq | 500 kHz (fixed) | 500 kHz (fixed) | Tie |
| FET Rds(on) | 100 mΩ | 110 mΩ | TPS5430 (slightly) |
| Current Limit (typ) | 4A | 6A | TPS5450 |
| Max Duty Cycle | 87% | 89% | TPS5450 |
| Quiescent Current | 3 mA | 3 mA | Tie |
| Package | HSOIC-8 PowerPad | HSOIC-8 PowerPad | Tie |
| Pin Compatible? | - | ✅ Yes, drop-in | - |
| Negative Voltage? | ✅ Officially supported | ⚠ Not officially documented | TPS5430 |
| Typical Price (1k) | ~$2.00 | ~$2.80 | TPS5430 |
Let's be honest - these two chips are nearly identical. They use the same controller, the same package, the same pinout. The main difference is the size of the internal MOSFET:
The TPS5450 uses a larger high-side N-channel MOSFET to handle 5A continuous (6A peak) vs the TPS5430's 3A (4A peak). Everything else - control loop, protection features, switching behavior - is essentially the same.
But here's something worth noting: the Rds(on) on the TPS5430 is actually slightly lower than the TPS5450 (100 mΩ vs 110 mΩ). That means at the same load current, the TPS5430 will dissipate slightly less power. The TPS5450's MOSFET is bigger to handle higher current, not to be more efficient at low current.
They are drop-in compatible. Same footprint, same pinout, same external component values for the same output voltage. You can design your PCB with a TPS5430, test it, and swap to a TPS5450 if you need more current. No board spin required.
From our experience helping customers with sourcing, this is the main reason engineers pick this family over newer, higher-performing parts - the flexibility to scale current without requalifying a board layout.
The TPS5430 officially supports inverting buck-boost topology (positive to negative voltage conversion). The TPS5450 does not list this in its datasheet, though some users on the TI E2E forum have reported it working. If you need a negative rail, go with the TPS5430.
| Scenario | Pick | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Your load is under 2.5A | TPS5430 | Plenty of margin, lower cost. The 5450 is overkill. |
| Your load is 2.5A–4.5A | TPS5450 | The 5430 won't have enough margin. The 5450 gives you headroom. |
| You need a negative voltage rail | TPS5430 | Officially supported and documented. |
| Cost is critical, load is under 1.5A | TPS5420 | Actually, go even smaller - the 2A version saves another 25%. |
| You want to future-proof your design | TPS5450 | Same footprint. If the product might scale up, start with the 5450 layout. |
Same external components work for both - that's the beauty of pin compatibility. A 15 μH inductor, 100 μF output cap, and the same feedback resistor divider work for either chip at 5V output.
But there are a couple things to watch:
A: Yes. Same pinout, same package, same footprints. You need to check two things: the inductor must be rated for the higher peak current, and the PCB copper must handle the higher thermal dissipation. Otherwise it's a straight swap.
A: At 1k quantity, the TPS5430 runs about $2.00 and the TPS5450 about $2.80 - roughly 40% more. At volume (10k+), the gap narrows to about 20-30%.
A: The TPS5430. Its Rds(on) is 100 mΩ vs the TPS5450's 110 mΩ, so at the same current the 5430 dissipates slightly less power. But the difference is small - we're talking about 0.25W less at 5A.
A: Not officially documented. Some users on TI's E2E forum have reported it working, but TI doesn't guarantee it. If you need a negative rail, stick with the TPS5430.
A: No, the same inductor value works for both at the same output voltage (15 μH for 5V, 22 μH for 12V, 10 μH for 3.3V in both). But the TPS5450 needs a higher saturation current rating.
A: For the TPS5430 at 3A, a 3A Schottky like the MBR360 or SS36 is sufficient. For the TPS5450 at 5A, step up to a 5A-rated Schottky like the MBR560. The diode conducts during the off-time, so its rating must match the output current.
A: The 54340/54540 parts handle up to 42V or 60V input, which gives you more headroom for automotive transients. They also have higher switching frequencies (up to 2.5 MHz). But they're more expensive and not pin-compatible with the 5430/5450. Pick the 340/540 series if you need higher input voltage or smaller inductor size.
A: Both are widely stocked. From our sourcing experience, the TPS5450 can have longer lead times during supply crunches.
| Part Number | Package | Typical Price (1k) | Lead Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPS5430DDAR | HSOIC-8 PowerPad | ~$2.00 | In stock |
| TPS5450DDAR | HSOIC-8 PowerPad | ~$2.80 | In stock |
Contact ICMASS for current pricing. Both parts available in original TI packaging with full traceability. We can also advise on which one fits your specific load requirements.





