The NCE9435 is a -30V/-5.1A P-Channel MOSFET in SOP-8 — a member of the ubiquitous "9435" family used for high-side load switching and reverse-polarity protection.
Out of stock, sourcing, or upgrading? The replacement landscape is wide: SI9435DY (the original), FDS9435 (lower RDS(on)), APM9435 (cost-optimized), NCE9435A (current die), AO4407 (the upgrade step).
From our Shenzhen distribution work (2025–2026), the 9435 family is one of the most frequently substituted sockets in battery products — and one of the most frequently remarked. Every lot we receive gets tested for RDS(on) and VGS(th), because a remarked smaller die passes visual checks every time.
| Parameter | NCE9435 | NCE9435A | SI9435DY | AO4407 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | NCE Power | NCE Power | Vishay (Siliconix) | Alpha & Omega Semi |
| Polarity | P-Channel | P-Channel | P-Channel | P-Channel |
| Package | SOP-8 | SOP-8 | SOP-8 | SOP-8 |
| VDS | -30V | -30V | -30V | -30V |
| ID continuous | -5.1A | -5.3A | -5.3A | -12A |
| RDS(on) @ 10V | 53mΩ max | 49mΩ max | 50mΩ typ | 14mΩ |
| RDS(on) @ 4.5V | 85mΩ max | 85mΩ max | — | ~20mΩ |
| VGS(th) | -1.0 to -3.0V | -1.0 to -3.0V | -1.0 to -3.0V | -1.0 to -3.0V |
| Gate charge | 11nC | 12nC | ~15nC | ~50nC |
| PD | 2.5W | 2.6W | 2.0W | 3.1W |
| Pinout | 1–3=S, 4=G, 5–8=D | 1–3=S, 4=G, 5–8=D | 1–3=S, 4=G, 5–8=D | 1–3=S, 4=G, 5–8=D |
| Drop-in? | — | Yes | Yes | Yes, if drive/thermal rechecked |
| Price class | budget | budget | mid | mid |
The replacement decision in one table: SI9435DY and NCE9435A are direct drop-ins with near-identical specs. The AO4407 is electrically superior — 14mΩ and -12A — but its higher gate charge and current capability mean the circuit's drive and thermal path need a recheck, not a blind swap.
NCE9435A is the current production die from the same manufacturer: -5.3A, 49mΩ max @ -10V, same SOP-8 pinout. It's the natural replacement when your BOM calls out NCE9435 and stock arrives as the -A — no board change, no revalidation needed.
SI9435DY is the Vishay original that defined the family. Choose it when the BOM mandates the branded part (customer spec, compliance, or corporate preferred list). Slightly higher gate charge and mid-tier price, but the socket is identical and the datasheet is battle-tested across two decades of designs.
The AO4407 is the upgrade path: -12A and 14mΩ roughly 4× lower conduction loss at the same current. Choose it when a design keeps hitting the 9435's thermal ceiling around 3–4A.
But it's not a blind swap. The ~50nC gate charge needs a stronger gate drive, and the 3.1W PD budget assumes the same SOP-8 copper pours handle the extra current you're about to draw.
Pin-compatibility: every member of the 9435 family — NCE9435/9435A, SI9435DY, FDS9435, APM9435, CEM9435, SD9435 — shares pins 1–3 Source, 4 Gate, 5–8 Drain.
Layout notes: the drain pins are the only thermal path, so keep the copper under pins 5–8 generous. Route the gate away from the switching node to avoid coupling.
RDS(on) across the replacement landscape — lower is less heat:
At 3A, the gap between NCE9435 and AO4407 is 0.48W vs 0.13W — the upgrade matters exactly where the 9435 family runs hot.
Replacement decision in two branches: like-for-like → any 9435-family part fits; thermal ceiling → step to the AO4407 and recheck gate drive and copper. If the board can move low-side, an N-Channel like the NCE9926 is a redesign, not a swap.
| Model | Type | Key Difference | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| FDS9435 | P-Ch, SOP-8 | -5.3A, 45mΩ, ON Semi | Marginally lower RDS(on) than the family average |
| APM9435 | P-Ch, SOP-8 | -6.2A, 60mΩ, ANPEC | Volume cost-optimized builds |
| AO4413 | P-Ch, SOP-8 | -15A, 8.5mΩ | Serious upgrade with driver and thermal recheck |
| SI4483ADY | P-Ch, SOP-8 | -13.5A, 8.8mΩ | Higher-current branded alternative |
| NCE9926 | Dual N-Ch, SOP-8 | 20V/6A, 2.5V drive | Switching to logic-driven low side instead |
Beyond the family: if the board can move the switch to the low side, an N-Channel like the NCE9926 gives 2.5V drive and lower RDS(on) per die — but it changes the topology, so it's a redesign, not a replacement.
A: Yes — same SOP-8 pinout, same -30V rating, nearly identical specs. NCE9435's 53mΩ max vs SI9435DY's 50mΩ typical is within noise. Both are 4.5V logic-level parts. The only practical difference is brand and price.
A: Electrically yes — 14mΩ and -12A is roughly 4× lower loss and 2× the current. But it's a different die class: ~50nC gate charge needs a stronger driver, and the higher capability invites designs to draw more current than the SOP-8 can shed. For a like-for-like swap, stay in the 9435 family; use the AO4407 as an upgrade with a drive and thermal recheck.
A: Every 9435-family part in SOP-8: NCE9435A, SI9435DY, FDS9435, APM9435, CEM9435, SD9435, GE9435, GSC9435. All share pins 1–3 Source, 4 Gate, 5–8 Drain and -30V. Differences are RDS(on), current, and price — not fit.
A: No — check the gate voltage first. The whole family shares the ±20V VGS limit. On a 24V rail with the gate pulled to ground, 24V sits across gate-source — every brand dies the same way. Add a Zener clamp between gate and source.
A: Measure RDS(on) at -4.5V — a remarked smaller die fails by 2–3×. In our experience (2025–2026), remarked parts pass visual checks and even VGS(th) spot tests; the on-resistance measurement at logic-level drive is what separates them. Batch-test the two specs on any non-authorized lot.
A: It switches on, but RDS(on) is unspecified below 4.5V. At -3.3V the die runs partially enhanced, and real-world resistance climbs 2–3×. Fine for low-current loads with headroom; for 2A+, add a level shifter or switch to a 2.5V-specified part like the NCE9926.
A: 3–4A continuous in an SOP-8 with good copper. The -5.1A rating is at 25°C with the case near ambient; RθJA at 50°C/W means 4A at 53mΩ is already a 42°C rise. Above that, step to the AO4407 with a layout recheck, or a TO-252 part.





