All three are ON Semiconductor ultrafast recovery rectifiers in the same SMA package. They share the same glass-passivated silicon technology, the same AEC-Q101 qualification, and the same pinout. But they cover three different voltage classes, and picking the wrong one means either a diode that fails on the first line surge, or a diode that runs hotter than it needs to for no reason.
The price spread across the three is modest - usually within 20–30% from lowest to highest. You're not making a cost decision here. You're making a voltage margin decision. Get it right and the diode runs for a decade. Get it wrong and you're troubleshooting a shorted rectifier at the worst possible time.
| Parameter | MURA220T3G | MURA140T3G | MURA260T3G | Best |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reverse Voltage (VRRM) | 200V | 400V | 600V | MURA260 |
| Forward Current (IO) | 2A | 1A | 2A | MURA220/260 |
| Reverse Recovery (trr) | 35ns | 65ns | 75ns | MURA220 (fastest) |
| Forward Voltage (VF @ rated I) | 0.95V @ 2A | 1.1V @ 1A | 1.45V @ 2A | MURA220 (lowest) |
| VF @ 150°C junction | 0.77V @ 2A | 0.89V @ 1A | 1.2V @ 2A | MURA220 |
| Surge Current (IFSM) | 40A | 35A | 30A | MURA220 |
| Reverse Leakage @ rated V, 25°C | 2μA | 5μA | 5μA | MURA220 |
| Conduction Loss @ rated I, 25°C | 1.9W | 1.1W | 2.9W | MURA140 (lowest) |
| Thermal Resistance (θJA) | 216°C/W | 216°C/W | 216°C/W | Equal |
| Junction Temp Range | -65 to +175°C | -65 to +175°C | -65 to +175°C | Equal |
| Package | SMA (DO-214AC) | SMA (DO-214AC) | SMA (DO-214AC) | Equal |
| Footprint | 4.57 × 2.92 mm | 4.57 × 2.92 mm | 4.57 × 2.92 mm | Equal |
| AEC-Q101 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Equal |
| ESD (HBM) | >4000V | >4000V | >4000V | Equal |
| Soft Recovery Option | MURS220T3G | MURS140T3G | MURS260T3G | MURS (any) |
| Price (relative) | Baseline | ~+10% | ~+20–30% | MURA220 (lowest) |
Yes, 100%. All three use the identical SMA (DO-214AC) package with the same J-bend lead configuration. Pin 1 is cathode (marked by the polarity band), pin 2 is anode. You can swap between them on the same PCB footprint with zero layout changes.
That said, don't swap between them casually. Putting a MURA220T3G (200V) where a MURA260T3G (600V) was originally specified is asking for a shorted diode on the first power-up if the reverse voltage exceeds 200V. Putting a MURA260T3G where a MURA220T3G was specified will work electrically but will run hotter (1.45V vs 0.95V VF). The pin compatibility is a logistics and procurement advantage — you can qualify one PCB layout for multiple voltage variants — not a license to substitute without checking the circuit requirements.
You'll notice the pattern across the three parts: 200V/35ns, 400V/65ns, 600V/75ns. This isn't ON Semi skimping on the higher-voltage parts. It's the physics of silicon PN junctions.
To block higher reverse voltage, the diode's drift region must be thicker and more lightly doped. That thicker region stores more charge during forward conduction. When the diode turns off, it takes longer to sweep that stored charge out. The result: higher voltage = more stored charge = slower recovery. Every silicon ultrafast rectifier family shows this tradeoff.
The engineering question isn't "which is the best diode?" It's "how much voltage do I actually need, and what's the fastest diode at that voltage?" Answer that question honestly — not with a margin-on-top-of-margin approach — and you'll end up with the coolest-running, most efficient design.
All three MURA parts have soft-recovery equivalents in the MURS series:
| Standard Ultrafast | Soft Recovery Version | Package | Key Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MURA220T3G | MURS220T3G | SMB | Soft recovery, larger package |
| MURA140T3G | MURS140T3G | SMB | Soft recovery, VF 1.25V vs 1.1V |
| MURA260T3G | MURS260T3G | SMB | Soft recovery, same VF |
From our experience with customers who've switched from MURA to MURS in noise-sensitive designs: the soft recovery characteristic typically reduces switching-node ringing amplitude by 50–70%, which translates to a 5–8dB reduction in conducted EMI at the switching frequency harmonics. Whether that matters depends on whether you're fighting an EMC compliance deadline. On a relaxed schedule with room for snubber tuning, MURA works fine. On a tight schedule with no room for board spins, the MURS premium is cheap insurance.
A: No. Rectified 220VAC gives 311V DC peak, rising to ~342V with 10% line tolerance, plus ringing. The MURA220T3G is rated 200V. It will fail, likely on the first switching cycle. For rectified mains, the minimum is MURA140T3G (400V). For 3-phase or surge-hardened designs, use MURA260T3G (600V).
A: If the circuit's reverse voltage is under 200V: it works fine, and the diode runs cooler (0.95V vs 1.45V VF). But if the original designer specified a 600V part, there's usually a reason — the circuit probably sees >200V reverse. Putting a 200V part in a 600V socket is one of the most common causes of "replaced the diode, blew again immediately" in SMPS repair. Always check the circuit's actual reverse voltage before substituting.
A: Because you pay for that margin in heat. At 2A, MURA260T3G dissipates 2.9W vs MURA220T3G's 1.9W. That extra watt requires more copper area, raises enclosure temperature, and shortens the life of nearby electrolytic capacitors. A 10°C rise in ambient temperature roughly halves capacitor lifetime. Over-specifying the diode voltage "just to be safe" has knock-on effects throughout the thermal design. Use the right voltage for the job, not the highest voltage you can buy.
A: For the secondary rectifier: the reverse voltage is VOUT + (VIN(max) / turns ratio). For a typical 220VAC flyback with a 10:1 primary-to-secondary turns ratio: roughly 24 + 375/10 = 61.5V steady-state. Even with leakage ringing doubling that, you're under 150V. Use MURA220T3G. The 200V rating is adequate, and you get the best efficiency (35ns, 0.95V VF). For the primary-side RCD clamp diode, which sees the full reflected voltage plus the leakage spike (potentially 400–500V): use MURA260T3G.
A: You're comparing apples and oranges — MURA140T3G is 400V/1A, MURA260T3G is 600V/2A. But if your question is "can I parallel MURA140T3G for more current at 400V?": not recommended. The negative temperature coefficient of VF causes current hogging between parallel diodes. If you need 2A at 400V, step up to a 2A-rated 400V part (like the MURS240 in SMB) or use the MURA220T3G if 200V is enough. Parallel operation of ultrafast rectifiers requires series resistance or impedance for current sharing — it adds components, increases losses, and usually isn't worth it compared to just using the right single diode.
A: All three MURA parts have standard (snappy) recovery characteristics. For inherently lower EMI, any of the MURS soft-recovery equivalents will produce less ringing at turn-off. Among the MURA parts themselves, the MURA220T3G has the lowest stored charge (smallest die, lowest voltage), so its snap-off energy is the smallest of the three. But if conducted EMI is a key concern, skip the MURA vs MURA comparison entirely and go straight to the MURS series.
A: Yes. All three are standard 5000 pieces per 13-inch reel. Same tape width, same pocket dimensions (SMA/DO-214AC standard). If you're running a pick-and-place line, you can switch between MURA220, MURA140, and MURA260 on the same feeder setup — just change the reel and update the BOM.





